Featured Stories
Show Preview | SVC TechCon 2018 Targets Thin Films
The Society of Vacuum Coaters draws industry professionals, engineers, academics, and scientists to its annual conference and expo.
Read moreSleeve Label Awards | AWA Confers 4 with Top Honors
AWA Alexander Watson Assoc. bestows awards on four winners of its annual Sleeve Label Competition.
Read moreShow Preview | INFOFLEX 2018 Collocates with Forum in Indianapolis
More than 240 exhibitors from every facet of the package printing [ampersand] converting industries will meet more than 2000 attendees.
Read moreCoating Matters | The 6 C's of Roll-to-Roll Coating Systems
Develop a balanced approach to precision coating by understanding these six areas of concentration.
Read more
News | New Products
-
Avery Dennison Offers Thermal Print Technology
Platinum Thermal technology is said to offer simplicity combined with quality and durability
-
AMI Issues Study of Polymer Demand in NAFTA
The report includes detailed statistical data for all major thermoplastic materials in the US, Canada, and Mexico with forecasts until 2022
-
BW Papersystems Launches RFID Tag Unit
The BW Bielomatik TagLiner provides a new chip bonding concept for the production of RFID tags, said to result in high speed and bonding strength
-
Constantia Flexibles Adds Laminator
The new equipment, working at the company’s South African subsidiary, will handle packaging for confectionary, snacks, and HPC products
-
Testing Machines Inc. Enhances COF Tester
The 32-76e COF tester now offers peel capabilities as well as other new features
-
Acucote Expands UV Inkjet Line
The company is now offering permanents, removables, and blockout adhesives, and has more additions planned
-
CCL Industries Acquires Imprint Plus
The bolt-on acquisition for Avery adds the manufacture of badges, signs, and more to CCL’s portfolio
White Papers
• Designing a Successful Retort-Grade Packaging Structure
• Hermetic-Seal Performance of BOPP Laminate Structures in VFFS Pouch Applications
• Methods and Design Considerations for the Application of Hot Melt Coatings
• BOPP Laminate Structures for “Over-the-Mountain” VFFS Pouch Applications
Expert Advice
Perhaps It's Time to Redefine Packaging Odor Specs
- Published: December 01, 2001, By Richard M. Podhajny, Ph.D., Contributing Editor
Printing and laminating of flexible packaging materials may involve the use of various inks, coatings, and adhesives. These materials inherently contain odorous solvents, which are the primary cause of undesirable odors in packaging products.
Traditionally, the odor of the printed product would be qualitatively assessed by the printer or converter. Typically, this is done by inserting a sample of the converted product into a jar, perhaps heating the jar, and then judging the objectionable odor. Obviously, this qualitative approach left much to be desired.
In the 1970s a quantitative technique began to be used in the flexible packaging converting industry to alleviate problems with the use of qualitative techniques. The key to this idea was the fact that ink, coating, and adhesive formulations were sufficiently similar. That is, they were all solvent-based and using similar solvents. By restricting the total amount of solvents retained in the product, a specification could be written that would provide some guarantee the odor level should be acceptable.
Use of gas chromatography became the standard method of quantifying the level of retained solvent. Although there were variations in how the tests were conducted, the technique allowed the flexible packaging industry to utilize a quantitative method of assuring the packaging products would be odor free.
One problem with this initial approach was that all the solvents used were not equal in their contribution to undesirable odor of the converted product. So, the idea came about to restrict the individual solvents. That is, each solvent would have a maximum level that would be allowed. For instance, toluene would be much more restricted than, say, ethanol.
Over the years, the acceptable amount of retained solvent has decreased, and specifications have become tighter. Into the 1980s, the use of gas chromatography was standard for facilities manufacturing flexible packaging products.
The key to the success of this approach was the use of a limited number of solvents. These solvents included toluene, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, and isopropylacetate. With the exception of toluene used in rotogravure, most of the solvents used by flexible packaging plants were alcohols and esters. Although other solvents were used, such as ketones, most package printing and laminating applications used a limited number of solvents. This greatly facilitated meeting the quantitative odor specifications.
In recent years, with the introduction of water-based and UV-curable inks and coatings, the standard for “low odor” in packaging products needs to be redefined. The “retained solvent” levels based on the solvent-based inks, coatings, and adhesives is not applicable to these new products; it is not a good predictor of the “odor potential” of these new printed, laminated, and converted packaging products.
Water-based inks bring with them new odorous materials, such as ammonia and amines. Retained levels of these materials will contribute to odor, but their acceptable levels may not be defined.
With the exception of ammonia, there is less standardization in the formulations of water-based inks, coatings, and adhesives as to which amines and other additives they utilize.
In the case of UV-curable inks and coatings, the source of odor in the package is even more difficult to define. Although we know the printed or converted product has an acrylic odor, it is difficult to quantify it. Unlike our ability to quantify the retained solvents, we do not have the same quantitative relationship to odor components in the UV products.
I'm afraid the conventional use of gas chromatography and determination of retained solvent cannot be used with water-based or UV ink systems to assure the package will conform to low-odor packaging standards.
To establish workable standards for low odor with these materials, the odor-causing components need to be identified and their quantitative unacceptable levels established by use of old-fashioned odor panelists.